SOFIMUN Ex-Com
has prepared the Delegate's Preparatory Guide &
Rules of procedure.
Delegate's handbook |
|
You can find more about the rules of the
1-st edition of Sofia International Model
United Nations in the Delegate's handbook |
|
Delegate's Preparatory Guide
&
Rules of procedure |
Delegate's Preparatory Guide
&
Rules of procedure
I. How to write a resolution
What is a resolution?
Being a simulation of the United Nations, the
outcome of the conference for each SOFIMUN
committee will be the same as it would for a UN
conference. The goal is to find solutions to
contemporary problems and verbalize these in
resolutions. A resolution is the formal format for
a UN decision, recommendation or request.
A resolution will therefore reflect the points
agreed upon by a majority of the country
representatives in a committee. In order to reach
this majority it is clear that delegates will have
to debate their different opinions and will have
to compromise until they find a solution most
representatives can agree upon. The goal at
SOFIMUN is to have one resolution on each topic on
the agenda.
Draft resolutions
Before a resolution is adopted by an official
vote, it is referred to as a draft-resolution.
Such a draft resolution can be a combined effort,
written by several countries with similar
interests or could even be brought into the debate
by one representative. A draft-resolution can
provide a good basis to start the discussion and
lobbying on the topics on the agenda, which will
shape the final resolution. It can (and will)
change substantially before it will be voted upon,
which should be taken into consideration before
rejecting a proposal. A draft resolution has no
minimum or maximum length, but does need to adhere
to some formalities that are found in the Rules of
Procedure.
Introducing a draft resolution
Before a resolution can be discussed, it needs two
sponsors and several signatories. Sponsors are
often the writers of the draft resolution or
delegates that agree with its contents. A
Signatory does not necessarily have to support the
resolution, but does want to see it discussed in
the committee. One quarter of the committee must
either be sponsor or signatory to the draft
resolution. This means that in a committee of
twenty delegates a total of 5 sponsors and
signatories are needed. With a minimum of 2
sponsors the drafter will thus need to find at
least 3 signatories.
Having obtained sufficient support, the draft
resolution must be submitted to the chairperson to
be approved by the secretariat. The secretariat
gives the resolution a number and distributes it,
after which the resolution can be introduced to
the committee.
When the floor is open, one of the sponsors may
now request to introduce the draft resolution,
after which that delegate reads out the operative
paragraphs. At this time other delegates can ask
questions concerning technicalities and grammar.
No debate or questions on the content is to take
place at this time. Any apparent spelling or
grammatical errors can also be pointed out and
will be changed without a vote. A draft resolution
is now properly introduced and can be discussed in
the formal debate. N.B: A draft resolution cannot
be referred to or discussed before it has been
formally introduced.
The format of a resolution
A (draft) resolution consists of 3 parts: The
header, preambulatory paragraphs and operative
paragraphs. The header has to contain the
committee name, the agenda topic it discusses, the
sponsors and the document code. The latter is
added by the secretariat.
A resolution, like many political documents, reads
as one long sentence, stating who makes the
decision, the reasons for the decision, and the
decision itself (Committee A, because of B,
takes action C).
Preambulatory paragraphs
The preambulatory paragraphs of a resolution state
the reasons, considerations and background of the
solution. It is used to refer to previous
resolutions or other official documents that deal
with the topic and to set out the considerations
made to come to the decision in the operative
paragraphs.
Preambulatory paragraphs always start with present
of perfect participles (recalling, stressing,
convinced, determined etc.) or with adjectives
(aware of, alarmed by etc.) The first word(s) are
underlined and indented and the paragraph ends
with a comma (,).
Operative paragraphs
The operative paragraphs of the resolution specify
the actions, requests or recommendations the
committee agreed upon. Every paragraph deals with
one specific part of the solution, so they should
be as short and concise as possible as well as
executable and rational.
Operative paragraphs start with a verb in the
present tense, third person (decides, requests,
calls upon etc.), some are accompanied by an
adverb (strongly, deeply, further etc.). Again the
first words are underlined. The paragraphs are
numbered and end with a semicolon (;) except for
the last paragraph that ends with a full stop (.).
The operative paragraphs are numbered. They can
also contain sub-points, which have an extra
indent and are numbers with lower-case letters.
Following the one-sentence structure, the
subpoints are a logical continuation of the
paragraph they fall under. They end with a comma
(,) except for the last one, that ends with a
semi-colon (;).
Things to think of when writing a resolution
When writing a resolution, some things must be
kept in mind. The resolution must not only be
correct grammar - and format-wise, but it must
also be an effective decision, attending to a
certain issue. It cannot discuss more than one
problem and must be executable and realistic.
The first thing to keep in mind is the competence
of the forum that is to pass the resolution. The
Security Council for example is the only body that
can decide to use military force. The First
Committee, although also discussing matters of
peace and security, does not have this competence.
It is up to the representatives to familiarize
themselves with the competence of their committee
and stay within them.
The powers of UN bodies (again with the exception
of the SC) are not binding upon members states,
but does not mean that a resolution is futile.
They are generally respected because they
represent what comes closest to the opinion of the
international community.
When writing a resolution it is important to
explore all the possibilities for a solution to
the topic under discussion. Although delegates
represent countries, and resolutions generally
address member states, these are not the only
entities that can be called upon. There are
several levels on which a problem can be
addressed:
·
The international community: a resolution can call
for a conference, suggest treaties or call upon
organizations such as the World Bank, WTO etc.;
·
The United Nations: a resolution can request
another UN body to put something on their agenda,
allocate funds, create working groups or
sub-committees;
·
Regional organizations: some actions are better
taken at a less centralized level. A resolution
can suggest, welcome, recommend etc. international
organizations such as the European Union, the
African Union, the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations and many more to take action;
·
Individual countries: A resolution can of course
address an individual country to do or refrain
from doing something;
·
Non Governmental Organizations: NGO’s are
specialized organizations on certain issues. It is
not uncommon for a resolution to ask an NGO to be
involved in certain matters, assist with their
knowledge or carry out certain tasks that fall
within their area of specialty.
·
Your forum: many forums have different
competences, most of which can be found in the UN
Charter. Examples are budget changes, creating
sub-committees, asking the International Court of
Justice for an Advisory Opinion, requesting the
Secretary-General to address certain issues etc.
An example of a resolution is on the next page.
Forum |
Security Council |
Issue |
Objective disarmament monitoring |
Co-submitted by |
Chile, China, France, Republic of Korea,
Russian Federation, Syria, Canada, Brazil |
Code |
U/2004/SC/ODM/3/FINAL |
THE
SECURITY COUNCIL,
[preambulatory paragraphs]
Aware
of the necessity of disarmament monitoring in
certain cases to ensure regional and/or global
security and stability,
Stressing
the need that disarmament monitoring should be
acceptable to all member states of the UN, in
particular the state(s) in question,
Realising
that objective disarmament monitoring can
facilitate the reestablishment of mutual trust,
Appreciating
the steps taken by the Security Council to
establish a permanent weapons’ inspections body of
the UN,
[operative
paragraphs]
1. Invites the General Assembly of
the UN to:
a.
create a
permanent list of independent persons whose
expertise in the field of weapons of mass
destruction and security issues is renowned,
b.
use his good
offices to assist in successful negotiations on
disarmament throughout the world;
2. Recommends member states propose
two experts for this permanent list, to be
reviewed every five years;
3. Suggests that these cases
permanent list should be used in all cases of
disarmament monitoring to select the members of
the disarmament monitoring team;
4. Suggests also that in these
cases, all parties to the disarmament have the
right to select a part of the delegation from the
above-mentioned permanent list of independent
experts, this being 40% for the monitored state(s)
and 40% for the parties requesting the monitoring,
these chosen experts select the remaining 20% of
the delegation of the permanent list;
5. Expresses the hope that all
countries will co-operate on this matter.
Here is a (non-exhaustive) list of words that can
be used to start a paragraphs.
First words for preambulatory paragraphs
Acknowledging |
Affirming |
Alarmed |
Approving |
Aware of |
Bearing in mind |
Believing |
Conscious |
Contemplating |
Convinced |
Declaring |
Deeply concerned |
Deeply convinced |
Deeply disturbed |
Deeply regretting |
Deploring |
Desiring |
Emphasizing |
Expecting |
Expressing its appreciation |
Expressing its concern |
Expressing its hope |
Expressing its satisfaction |
Firmly convinced |
Fulfilling |
Fully alarmed |
Fully aware of |
Fully believing |
Guided by |
Having adopted |
Having considered |
Having examined |
Having received |
Having studied |
Keeping in mind |
Noting |
Observing |
Pointing out |
Praising |
Reaffirming |
Realizing |
Recalling |
Recognizing |
Referring |
Seeking |
Stressing |
Taking into account |
Taking into consideration |
Taking note |
Viewing with concern |
Welcoming |
First words for operative paragraphs
Accepts |
Affirms |
Appreciates |
Approves |
Asks |
Authorizes |
Calls for |
Calls upon |
Condemns |
Confirms |
Congratulates |
Considers |
Declares |
Demands |
Deplores |
Designates |
Draws the attention to |
Emphasizes |
Encourages |
Endorses |
Expresses its concern |
Expresses its hope |
Insists |
Invites |
Notes |
Proclaims |
Proposes |
Reaffirms |
Recognizes |
Recommends |
Regrets |
Reminds |
Requests |
Resolves |
Solemnly condemns |
Stresses |
Suggests |
Supports |
Takes note of |
Transmits |
Trusts |
Urges |
Amendments
The moment a draft resolution is introduced is
only the beginning of the debate. It is by no
means going to be the final document. Many
representatives may want to see some things
changed, added or left out. This can be achieved
through amendments to the operative paragraphs of
the resolution. There are two types of amendments:
“regular” amendments and friendly amendments.
Friendly amendments
When a representative proposes an amendment that
all the sponsors of the draft resolution agree
upon, this is called a friendly amendment. To have
a friendly amendment incorporated the amendment
has to be submitted to the chairperson in writing,
signed by all the sponsors. Effective lobbying can
save the forum a lot of time voting on amendments
by convincing the sponsors of the draft
resolution.
Amendments
Amendments that are not friendly are simply
referred to as amendments. They require three (3)
sponsors and need to be submitted in writing to
the chairperson.
An amendment can propose to insert, strike or
replace a paragraph or part of it. An amendment
must contain the following information: The code
of the draft resolution it applies to, the
paragraph it applies to and what it intends to
change. For example:
·
Insert a new paragraph after para. 3: “Expresses
its hope that all countries involved will do their
utmost to solve the problem”
·
Insert the word “regularly” in para. 8 between “to
keep it” and “informed”
·
Strike para. 5
·
Strike from para. 2 “and to (…) issues”
·
Replace in para 7. “to monitor the development”
with “to accelerate the development”
Unless withdrawn a resolution remain “on the
table” until they are voted upon after the closure
of debate.
Working papers
A representative may want to distribute a paper
that is not a draft resolution. These working
papers have no prescribed format, it can for
instance be a report by an expert, an article or
data or suggestions written by the delegate, but
also a preliminary draft for a resolution.
Distributing a working paper is often done by
NGO’s to make country representatives aware of
certain issues, or by delegates wanting to inform
the committee in an efficient way. The are an
efficient way of conveying information to the
forum without taking time away from the debate.
A working paper must be submitted to the
chairperson for the secretariat to approve it,
assign it a number and distribute it. No sponsors
or signatories are required. Like draft
resolutions and amendments, working papers cannot
be discussed or referred to unless they have been
approved and distributed.
II. The forum in session
Roll call
Before the beginning of each session the
chairperson will hold a roll call to see how many
and which representatives are present. The chair
will call upon the representatives in alphabetical
order at which point they may answer with either
“present” or “present and voting”. When stating
“present and voting” this means that
representative may not, should a substantive vote
take place during that session, abstain from
voting (see Voting).
The quorum for sessions is the majority of the
representatives on the roll call list. Without
this quorum sessions cannot start.
The debate
There are three different types of session in the
simulation, ranging from formal to informal
debate. Each type of session has a specific
purpose in the debate leading up to the voting on
a draft resolution. Next to the debate there are
several points and motions that delegates may
raise to make a request, ask for clarification of
the rules or move into a different type of
session.
1. Formal debate
Formal debate, as the name suggests, is the most
formal type. This is where the general direction
of a resolution is discussed and statements on a
country’s policy are given. Also the formal
setting is the only one in which formal voting
procedures can take place on the agenda,
amendments and resolutions.
During the formal debate a General Speakers List
(GSL) will be kept by the chairperson and there is
a time limit for speeches. If a representative
wishes to make a statement during formal debate he
can be added to the GSL by sending a note to the
chairperson with that request and you will be
given the floor when it is their turn. The
speaking time can be changed if the forum desires,
this is done by a motion to change the speaking
time (rule 13, see Points and Motions).
If a representative finishes his speech before the
speaking time runs out they can choose to yield
their remaining time (rule 14). There are three
yields: to another delegate, to questions and to
the chair. Yielding to another delegate will give
them the opportunity to hold a speech for the
remaining time. Yielding to questions gives other
representatives an opportunity to ask questions
until the time has run out. Yielding to the chair
ends the turn after which the chairperson will
recognize the next representative on the GSL. When
speaking in yielded time, you cannot yield that
time again.
Etiquette during speeches
Speeches follow a formal pattern. Representatives
will start by thanking the chairperson for the
floor before making their statement. They also
refer to themselves in the third person. This is
because “I” or “me” would imply that it is their
personal opinion, which of course it is not. They
represent their country, their government
specifically. They will therefore refer to
themselves by the name of their country, the
government or the people of that country or simply
“we”. The same goes for referring to other
delegates. A typical speech will start like this:
Thank you, honorable chair. The People’s Republic
of China does not agree with the statements made
by the representative from the United States. The
Chinese government firmly believes that the
solution is to be found elsewhere. We therefore
strongly suggest…
During speeches it is important to use
parliamentary language and conduct. Respect is the
key, remember that these people represent
countries in the committee. Calling an idea stupid
is nothing less than an insult to an entire
nation. Not doing so will also hurt your own
interests, for it is less likely that people will
listen to you and your ideas if you discard theirs
in a rude manner.
Between speeches, and sometimes during, delegates
can raise points or motions. See Points and
Motions for the possibilities.
2. Moderated Caucus
To get into more detail on certain matters that
have come up in the formal debate, a slightly less
formal form of debate provides for a quicker
discussion. The moderated caucus knows no speakers
list, delegates are recognized after raising their
placard, indicating they wish to speak. This
results in a more vivid and interactive debate on
a specific issue within the debate.
A moderated caucus has a limited time, shorter
speaking time and always has a specific purpose
from which representatives cannot deviate. The
motion for a moderated caucus (see Points and
Motions) requires a second, meaning a fellow
delegate that supports your motion. A request for
a Motion for a moderated Caucus may go as follows:
Delegate: Motion for a moderated caucus.
Chair: United Kingdom, please rise and specify
your motion.
Delegate: Thank you honorable chair, the United
Kingdom proposes a moderated caucus of 5 minutes,
with a speaking time of 30 seconds, for the
purpose of discussing operative paragraph 2.
Chair: Do we have a second?
Delegate 2: Second!
Chair: Thank you Germany, we have a second, we
will now go into voting procedure on the motion
for a moderated caucus of 5 minutes with 30 second
speaking time, for the purpose of discussing
operative paragraph 2. All in favor, please raise
your placards… thank you. All opposed, please
raise your placards… thank you. With 9 votes in
favor and 6 against there is a majority. We are
now in moderated caucus, any delegates wishing to
speak, please raise your placard.
A delegate that speaks on another matter that the
purpose of the moderated caucus will be called to
order by the chairperson. If the chairperson for
some reason does not notice this, another delegate
may raise a Point of Order to make this known (see
Points and Motions). Other than the Point of
Personal Privilege, - Parliamentary Inquiry and –
Order, no motions are in order and time cannot be
yielded. Etiquette during moderated caucus is the
same as during the formal debate.
3. Un-moderated Caucus
The least formal type of debate is the
un-moderated caucus, also known as a lobby
session. This type of debate can be used to work
out the small details of a resolution, take aside
an ally or an opponent to discuss strategy or to
have some time to write out amendments.
The un-moderated caucus essentially suspends the
session temporarily and gives representative a
chance to talk to each other. Voting blocs can go
over their strategy or you can try to convince
other side of your point, or maybe exchange voting
promises on different topics. The opportunities
are endless and will be discussed in more detail
in the chapter on Representing your country or
organization.
Like the moderated caucus, an un-moderated caucus
is also limited in time and has a specific
purpose. The motion for an un-moderated caucus is
therefore the same, except for the speaking time.
Because of the limited time and to ensure
effectiveness, leaving the room during unmoderated
caucus is generally not allowed.
Points and motions
Between speeches in the formal debate the floor is
“open”. At this time a delegate can raise to a
point or motion, which essentially is a formal
request or a procedural statement. There are seven
different points and motions that can be found in
the Rules of Procedure.
1.
Point of
Personal Privilege (rule 15): This point can be
raised for personal reasons or discomforts, for
example when something prevents you from following
the debate or work. You can raise to a Point of
Personal Privilege when you are cold and want the
window closed, you need to leave the room to visit
the bathroom, need to work on your laptop or it is
simply impossible for you to hear what another
representative is saying. For this last reason,
the PoPP is the only point that can be raised
during a speech, when someone speaks very softly
or there is too much noise, you can interrupt the
speech, asking for the chairperson to attend to
the problem.
2.
Point of Order
(rule 16): This point is raised to complain about
improper parliamentary procedure. Normally, when a
delegate is not following the Rules of Procedure,
the chairperson will correct them, but it may
happen that the chairperson misses it. If the PoO
is recognized, you can explain why you believe
correct procedure was not followed.
3.
Point of
Parliamentary Inquiry (rule 17): Although we
encourage you to study the Rules of Procedure
carefully, it is understandable that in session
questions may arise. What the speaking time is,
how many votes are needed for a motion to pass or
any other questions concerning procedure may be
asked by raising a PoPI.
4.
Motion for
Un-moderated Caucus (rule 19): As described above,
the un-moderated caucus suspends the formal
meeting for lobbying for a set time on a specific
topic, both of which have to be specified in the
motion. The motion is non-debatable and will be
put to a vote immediately. The chairperson can
rule out this motion, which is not subject to
appeal.
5.
Motion for
Moderated Caucus (rule 20): As described above,
the moderated caucus interrupts the formal debate
for a more rapid debate on a specific topic for a
set time, with short speaking times, all of which
have to be specified in the motion. The motion is
nondebatable and will be put to a vote
immediately. The chairperson can rule out this
motion, which is not subject to appeal.
6.
Motion to
Change the Speaking Time (rule 13): If during
formal debate delegates feel the need to extend or
reduce the speaking time they can raise a motion
to change the speaking time. The decision is up to
the discretion of the chairperson, which is not
subject to appeal. Asking for a 10 minute speaking
time is quite futile, and when the request is for
a very short speaking time you might want to
consider a moderated caucus.
7.
Motion for
Adjournment (rule 21): At the end of the day’s
session a motion for adjournment is necessary to
adjourn the meeting until the next day. The motion
requires a second and is debatable. This means
that a moderated caucus of no more than 5 minutes
can be held on whether to adjourn or not. After
the debate the forum immediately votes on the
motion. A majority is needed for the motion to
pass. Since this is a procedural vote,
representatives may not abstain (see Voting). The
chairperson can rule out this motion, but this
decision is subject to appeal. When appealing the
decision of the chair a two-thirds majority is
needed for the appeal to pass. The forum then goes
into debate and voting on the original motion.
Chairpersons will have valid reasons to rule out a
motion, so use your appeals wisely.
8.
Motion for
Closure of the Debate (rule 22): When the forum
believes sufficient debate on an agenda topic has
taken place and is ready to vote on the draft
resolutions and amendments. Like the motion for
adjournment this motion needs a second and is
debatable. No abstentions are allowed when voting.
The chairperson can rule out this motion, which is
subject to appeal. When in formal debate and the
GSL expires, the debate automatically closes
without a motion.
The order of the points and motions above is also
the order of precedence when multiple motions are
raised. When the floor is open it is possible that
several points and motions are simultaneously
raised, at which time the chairperson will make an
inventory of the types of points and motions and
deal with them in the appropriate order.
If a motion to change the type of debate passes,
the remaining motions are automatically off the
table. If there are two similar motions, for
example a moderated caucus, but one is for 5
minutes and the other one is for 10 minutes, the
chair will deal with the one altering the
proceedings the most. In the example that would be
the motion for a 10 minute moderated caucus. If
that motions fails, the forum will vote on the 5
minute moderated caucus.
Setting the Agenda
Before the forum can start debate on a topic, it
has to be decided in which order the topics will
be dealt with. This is done by setting the agenda.
At the beginning of the conference, the
chairperson will distribute a provisional agenda.
Some representatives may (and will) however
propose to deal with another issue first, because
they deem it more critical, or it lies closer to
their interest. They may introduce a draft agenda
with an alternative order of the agenda points. No
new points may be added. A draft agenda need three
(3) sponsors and procedurally follows the same
formalities as a draft resolution. It needs to be
submitted to the chairperson for approval, coding
and distribution.
The normal rules of debate apply to the process of
setting the agenda. When voting on the agendas
they are dealt with in the order of which one
changes the provisional agenda most. The first
agenda that gathers a two-thirds majority will be
the agenda for the entire conference. If no agenda
gathers the required majority the debate resumes
and a new speakers list is opened. If agenda
setting takes a long time to set the agenda, the
Secretary-General can impose an agenda on the
forum to get the debate started.
Voting
When the debate is closed, the forum will vote on
all draft resolutions and amendments or agendas on
the floor. This can be because the GSL is expired
or because a motion for closure of debate passes.
Votes on draft agendas, draft resolutions and
amendments are substantive votes. Voting will also
take place to decide on motions for (un-)moderated
caucus, adjournment or closure of the debate and
to appeal the decision of the chair. These are
considered procedural votes.
When voting on several draft resolutions on the
same topic, they are dealt with in the order in
which they were submitted and coded. First the
amendments to that resolution are put to a vote,
followed by the resolution as it is with the
passing amendments.
Voting procedures
For most votes to pass a simple majority is
necessary, meaning more votes in favor than
against. If the division is 50-50 the matter put
to a vote is rejected, because there are not more
in favor. Some votes require a two-thirds majority
to pass, like a draft agenda and the appeal of the
decision of a chairperson. If the division is
exactly two-thirds in favor and one-third against,
it passes. The only exception to the majorities
are substantive votes in the Security Council,
requiring nine affirmative votes and not having a
negative vote from any of the Permanent Five
members of the SC (rule 35).
Non-member delegations or non-governmental
organizations do not have a vote in substantive
matters. They are allowed to vote on procedural
matters.
During voting procedures no leaving the room or
communication between representatives is allowed.
The voting will proceed uninterrupted, with the
exception of a point of order, parliamentary
inquiry or personal privilege.
A representative can either vote “yes”, “no” or
“abstain” indicated by raising your placard when
the chairperson asks for all those in
favor/against/abstaining.
Roll call voting
Another option in substantive voting is to ask for
a roll call vote. The chairperson will
alphabetically call upon delegates, starting at a
random position on the list, and ask them
individually for their vote. A representative may
pass once, meaning the chairperson finishes the
list and comes back to those that have passed.
This gives you an opportunity to listen to what
other delegates are voting, but after having
passed, a delegate is not allowed to abstain, so
they must vote either “yes” or “no”.
In a roll call vote, delegates may vote “with
rights”. This will give the delegate an
opportunity to explain their vote after the voting
has finished. This may for instance be to explain
why they did not vote according to expectations.
III. Representing your Country or Organization
During the SOFIMUN Conference you are no longer a
student taking a course, but you are representing
a country that is not your own or a non-member
organization. Your task is to try to incorporate
as many of your country’s or organization’s
interests in the resolutions that are passed.
To effectively represent your position you will
need to adapt to your role, effectively playing a
part like an actor would, but while writing your
own script. Like an actor, your performance will
be most effective with good preparation and
training. In this chapter we will deal with the
tools and preparation you will need to play your
role.
Preparing for your position
It is paramount to remember that your own opinion
should not prevail during SOFIMUN. The success of
the conference depends on the accurateness with
which delegates represent the position they have
been given. To properly represent your country or
organization you will need to prepare your role
thoroughly. Become familiar with the political
philosophy, the economic- and foreign policy and
the culture of your country. The following points
are important in your preparation:
1.
History:
The history of a country, both domestic and
international, is often important to know when
researching their policy on current events. The
history may show certain existing relations and
alliances or reasons for taking a certain stance
on a topic. Find out about recent conflicts,
domestic history or any other historical factors
that may influence foreign policy.
2.
Political structure and ideology:
Does your country have democracy or dictatorship,
is it a Kingdom or an Emirate? Is it based on
capitalism, socialism, religion etc.? As a
representative of this government you must know
what their philosophies and interests are in order
to properly try to achieve your (their) goals.
3.
Economy:
What monetary system does your country have? Are
they dependent on certain resources, areas of
business or other countries? Are they heavily
indebted? To what economic or trade organizations
is your country a member. These are all factors
that may come into play when trying to reach an
agreement.
4.
Defense:
What kind of military structure does your country
have? Are they regular contributors to peace
keeping missions? Are they member of a military
alliance? The factors may be essential when
discussing crisis situations and trying to offer
or obtain assistance.
5.
Foreign policy:
Your county’s foreign policy is perhaps the most
important during your deliberations. Not only is
it influenced by the points above, but it can be
influenced by many other factors. To which
treaties is your country a signatory and has it
made reservations? How much influence does it have
in the world or its region? Is it a member of a
bloc or international organizations that may
influence policy? Countries can be very active
internationally or be very secluded, advocate
pacifism or humanitarian intervention. These are
essential facts to know, for they will determine
the truthfulness of the conference. Other
delegates will also study your policy, therefore
misrepresenting your position can frustrate the
proceedings.
Preparing for the topics
The points above are all still very general. After
you learn more about your country and its
policies, you must subsequently find out what they
country’s position is on the specific topics on
the agenda of your forum. This means applying what
you learned about your country, but it will also
take a lot of specific research.
History
To resolve a matter it is important to look at the
causes of the conflict or the situation. Delegates
must be familiar with the roots of the problem,
whether it is a military crisis or climate change.
Knowing the causes will help in the quest for
solutions.
But it is not just the history of the topic itself
that is important. What has been undertaken in the
past? It is futile to discuss solutions if they
have proven ineffective in the past. But an answer
may also be as simple as improving on a past
effort. A representative must be aware of what the
UN, a regional organization, neighboring countries
or NGO’s have attempted or achieved.
The present
To adequately address a topic, a delegate must be
fully aware of the current status of the issue and
the factors influencing it. For this it is not
only important to know your country’s involvement,
but also that of the UN in general, other
organizations and other representatives in your
forum.
Countless sources can be used to research the
topics. Websites of the UN or organizations or
sites dedicated to the issue itself, newspaper
archives, magazine articles or academic articles
are all very good sources. Combined they will give
you the expertise you need to address the topics.
Your position
Knowing the general politics and interests of your
country or organization will help you to determine
their position on the topics, but as said before,
this is only general. Many more factors may
influence an country’s standpoint.
To research the specific position of a country one
must to further than the general politics. There
are many ways of finding out what it is, but it is
not necessarily easy. Of some countries the
foreign policy is well known or quite obvious,
they may be on the news on a daily basis or be
very open. But the truth is that most countries
are never fully open about many of their policies
or the reasons behind them.
The most obvious place to start is the website of
their government, their ministry of foreign
affairs or of their Permanent Mission to the UN
(most can be found at
http://www.un.org/members). If the country you
represent has an embassy in your country, they
will often prove willing to offer you assistance.
The catch with this information is that it is not
necessarily accurate or complete. A country may
have a number of reasons for withholding certain
details or deviate from reality. This may be for
security reasons, to leave room for bargaining or
because the full truth is not as appealing as they
may want to divulge. A country may for instance be
an advocate of human rights, but at the same time
not have the best history when it comes to human
rights violations.
By combining the public policy with knowledge
obtainable from other sources, such as academic or
journalistic articles it is possible to
reconstruct their actual policy. Other sources may
also be helpful to achieve this. National
political debates are sometimes published, but
voting records and official statements in the UN
can often be found. The more sources you employ,
the more accurate your role fulfillment will be.
The debate
A resolution will not magically appear after
representatives have given their policy statement.
This merely lays out the starting point of the
debate. Once you know what the different positions
are it becomes clear who have similar interests,
who may be won over and who your fiercest opponent
will be. It is through persuasion, cooperation and
late-night lobbying that a resolution will slowly
take its final shape.
Speeches
To get a point across, delivering a good speech is
essential for every representative. In formal
debate and moderated caucus you must use your
speeches to convince the forum of your position,
and why the opposing position should not be
considered. Whether a speech is good depends on
both content and presentation. Content largely
depends on preparation, but both rely on practice.
Content
Most of the content of your speeches can be
contrived during your preparation. While
researching your policy you can carefully
construct the arguments that speak in your favor.
By researching your opponent’s policy you can
already construct counter-arguments to their
possible arguments.
Speaking time is limited, therefore you must learn
to keep your arguments concise. If you have one
minute to bring your case it is no use to bring 5
separate arguments why your position is the right
one, and the other’s is wrong. If you want to cut
down a tree you do not saw off the branches, you
must saw at the base. Leaving the details for
lobbying makes the plenary debate much more
effective and you’re less likely to lose the
attention of your audience.
In some positions it may not be wise to reveal the
whole truth, depending on your position and what
you are trying to accomplish. But remember that
your credibility will suffer if your forum
discovers that you are not telling the truth,
which may affect their willingness to listen to
you in the future.
Presentation
To keep an audience interested in what you have to
say it is important you give them something they
want to listen to. A clear speech that is
understandable and easy to listen to is essential
for this. During your speech, pay attention to the
following points in your presentation:
1.
Audibility:
Speak loud enough for all to hear. Speak calmly
and articulate clearly, but do not speak too
slowly, for that quickly becomes boring.
2.
Structure:
Make sure your speech has an opening, an
explanation of your main arguments and a closing.
Structure helps you keep track of your thoughts,
but a well-structured speech also helps your
audience to remember better what you tell them.
3.
Relax:
Take a deep breath before you speak and try to
appear relaxed. Stand still while you speak and do
not make big gestures with your hands. However
good your speech is, a tense attitude will
distract from the content.
4.
Be concise:
Formulating long and complicated sentences can
cause much confusion. Short and effective speeches
are much more powerful.
5.
Captivate your audience:
A good speech doesn’t only depend on what you say
and how you structure it, but also on how you tell
it. Monotonously reading from a paper is very
likely to lose the interest of your audience.
Vary your tone, show emotion in your speech and
make eye contact with your entire audience.
6.
Use humor:
An ancient cliché, but not without reason, humor
helps. You want your speech to be the one your
fellow delegates remember and a well-placed joke
from time to time works wonders. Don’t exaggerate
however, when you try too hard to be funny, it’s
most likely that you’re not.
Countless books have been written on techniques of
argumentation and presentation. The points above
are merely general guidelines. Representatives are
encouraged to familiarize themselves with the
techniques of public speaking and argumentation.
Many people feel uncomfortable speaking in public.
Most universities have a debate society that offer
courses for you to overcome this fear and perfect
your argumentation and presentation. Practice
makes perfect.
Lobbying
As explained in the chapter on The forum in
session most of the details will not be settled in
the plenary debate. Lobbying is a very powerful
tool to form strong alliances, persuade your
opponents, get your amendment to pass or alter the
agenda. Lobbying is an art that some people have
turned into careers. It does not only entail
negotiating and persuading, but also networking
and socializing. Delegates are not mindless
robotic extensions of a government, they are
people. In lobbying therefore people skills are
equally important as power of persuasion.
Before starting the lobbying process it is
important to make an inventory of the situation.
What is it exactly you are trying to achieve? Who
are your allies, who can be persuaded and who is
beyond persuasion? This goes beyond the one topic
under discussion, some countries may have
something you want, while you have something they
want on the next agenda item.
Secondly you need a strategy. This will depend on
the topic, what it is you are trying to accomplish
and what can you afford to lose? In the end no
representative will achieve fully what they set
out to achieve, so prepare to compromise. There
are several ways to build up your strategy:
1.
Convincing
with good arguments should always be the first
tactic to try. Know your topic and position well
and try to sell it. If your points are valid this
will prove to be most successful.
2.
Gather enough
allies to convince adversaries of your cause. If a
delegate realizes he will lose when it comes to
voting, he will want to become productive. If he
doesn’t his national interests will be completely
neglected in the resolution.
3.
Make sure you
have “diplomatic change”. If you have something
another delegate needs, it could be traded for
what you need. If topic A is very important to
your country, but topic B is not that vital to
your foreign policy. If this is the other way
around for a fellow delegate, you may convince
them to support you on topic A in exchange for
your concurring vote on topic B.
4.
Aim high. You
may choose to enter the debate with higher aims
than you actually want to achieve. This way you
build up virtual diplomatic change. This strategy
requires caution though, for aiming too high may
scare other delegates into turning away from you.
And if they realize you are purposely being rigid
they may not want to negotiate further with you.
These strategies are not the only ones, but most
others are derived from these or are combinations
of these, but you are only limited by your
imagination. Regardless of your strategy, there
are some essential directions for lobbying:
Effective lobbyists:
ü
Set clear objectives, priorities and targets;
ü
Build well-argued, timely and united positions;
ü
Bring constructive and positive input;
ü
Propose realistic alternatives.
Bad lobbyists:
§
Lack understanding of what can/cannot be done;
§
Don’t compromise;
§
Make shallow arguments;
§
Intervene too late;
§
Are aggressive;
§
Make little personal contact.
Also remember that lobbying is a very social tool,
it does not end when sessions are adjourned.
Sometimes buying a fellow delegate a drink during
the evening program can prove as effective as your
strongest argument.
The Security Council
As indicated above, the Security Council differs
slightly from the other committees. For a
resolution to be adopted in the SC they need more
than a simple majority as well as the concurring
votes of the Permanent Five members (P5). This
will often mean that compromising will be more
essential than in other committees.
As it is the goal of the conference to adopt a
resolution on each agenda topic, all delegates
must work together on the matter. If you feel that
a possibly very good resolution may encounter
opposition from a P5 member, it is important to
include them in the negotiations, to see what
changes can be made to prevent them from using
their “veto power”.
At the same time it is important for P5 members to
realize that the veto is a powerful tool, not to
be used lightly. It is a last resort for when a
matter is absolutely critical to your foreign
policy. When used to bully fellow delegates, you
will lose credibility and consequently valuable
support for other matters that may be important to
your country.
The Human Rights Council
Part IIX of the Rules of Procedure is specific for
the Human Rights Council. It gives them some extra
powers regarding the appointing of a Special
Rapporteur for certain issues or countries. This
appointment, including the specific mandates,
shall be included in the Council’s resolution.
The Conference on Disarmament
Part IX of the Rules of Procedure is specific for
the Conference on Disarmament (CD). Other than the
other committees, the CD does not produce
resolutions that require a majority to pass. Due
to their special character, they produce Programs
of Work that require consensus. Consensus
essentially means that the CD should be in full
agreement, which obliges the delegates to
cooperate closely and compromise.
The CD can establish subsidiary bodies that can
deal with specific issues with more detail than
the CD could. These subsidiary bodies can take the
form of ad hoc sub committees, working groups,
technical groups or groups of governmental
experts.
Non-member delegations
Next to member states, there are many more actors
in the UN. They are the non-member delegations
such as Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s).
These organizations play a very important role,
and have a very difficult task.
Most NGO’s are single issue organizations, think
of Greenpeace for the environment or Amnesty
International for Human Rights. It is their
objective to convince governments to incorporate
as many of their aims into a resolution. The catch
is that they do not have a vote on substantive
matters and they cannot sponsor a resolution.
Their power of persuasion is paramount. To
accomplish this NGO’s are often represented by
professional lobbyists.
The fact that an NGO cannot vote on the resolution
however, does not mean that they can be ignored.
They are specialists in their field, which can
prove to be very helpful in finding solutions that
countries may not have thought of. Not taking into
account the position of a specialized NGO will
also reflect negatively on your country, reducing
your credibility in the debate. Nevertheless
representing an NGO will require a lot of
dedication and hard work.
Although NGO’s cannot officially sponsor a draft
resolution, this does not mean that they cannot
write or help write one. To have an NGO added to
the minimum number of sponsors and signatories may
give a draft resolution more authority, for it has
the support of those whose specialty and ideology
it concerns.
Note-passing
During sessions, communication is not limited to
the verbal speeches. Representatives may pass
notes to each other while in formal debate or
moderated caucus. Notes can be used for questions,
asking support or coordinating your strategies.
During sessions there may be note-passers present
do deliver your notes to the addressee or you may
simply have them passed along.
Note-passing is strictly for diplomatic purposes
only, not for inquiring where to have dinner or
other unrelated matters. Note-passers and chairs
reserve the right to read notes or suspend
note-passing when they deem it necessary.
Opening statements
Delegations or blocs may be required to give an
opening statement at two moments in the
conference.
The first is at the opening of the conference,
during the General Assembly, where one
representative from each country or bloc will hold
a short speech on the general position of their
countries and some specific matters that they
consider essential. This will give all
representatives a good overview of where you stand
and who to lobby with. The blocs will have one
representative speaking on behalf of, for example,
the countries represented in the African Union.
Before these speeches are given the delegations
will be given the opportunity to coordinate their
speeches.
The second moment is at the start of the forum
sessions, before the agenda is set. Each
representative will be given the opportunity to
shortly set out their position and objectives
concerning the topics on the agenda. This will
give your fellow delegates a better understanding
of the general direction of the forum and what
areas they will need to focus on.
The media
The media will also be represented in the
conference in the form of an online media space of
SOFIMUN 2008, a daily in-brief news space covering
the proceedings in the conference week. There will
be journalists in jour forum, publishing the
efforts that are going on both in and out of
sessions. But the press can be used for more than
mere informing.
A good delegate may find that he or she can use
the press to their advantage. You may convince
them to interview you so that all can read about
your efforts and be convinced by your arguments.
Having a good relationship with the media may
persuade them to display your side of the story
rather than that of your opponent. You can make
yourself look good in the media, which is a very
effective way to gain support. Simply think of all
the photo opportunities used and abused in
election campaigns.
The press can also be a good source of
information. A journalist may have had the chance
to interview a fellow delegate and thus having
information others will not know before it is
published.
These are only two of countless possible means to
use the media to your advantage. Like in lobbying
you are only limited by your imagination, but
please note that bribing is very inappropriate and
therefore not allowed.
Final general remarks
Some final general remarks to keep in mind during
the conference.
Be constructive and cooperate! Being rigid may be
necessary in some exceptional cases, when a matter
is essential for your foreign policy. It is very
likely however to work in your disadvantage.
Ignoring the majority may result in them ignoring
you, leaving your interests disregarded. Remember
that only a simple majority is needed for the
resolution to pass. Instead of being obstinate, be
constructive and offer acceptable alternatives.
This way it is possible to work some of your
interests into a resolution that you may oppose,
but that may pass nevertheless. A bird in the hand
is worth two in the bush.
Be diplomatic in your speeches and in your
behavior! You are representing autonomous
governments and the people they represent. Not
treating them with the respect they deserve will
result in them returning the favor. In this regard
it is also important to think of language. The
official language at SOFIMUN is English, and you
will need to use it at all times. Even when
lobbying with fellow delegates that all speak the
same other language as you, it will be very
uninviting for other representatives to join the
discussion when they find out you are not speaking
a language they understand.
Be punctual! Time is a scarce commodity in a
one-week conference so it must be used
effectively. Appearing late for a session not only
disrupts the session and the proceedings, but it
will also mean you may have missed some crucial
moments in the deliberation, weakening your
position. However late you may find yourself
lobbying at night, being late the next morning is
indefensible. Moreover, tardiness is considered
very disrespectful to those that did show up on
time.
IV. Rules of Procedure
I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
RULE 1 -
Rules of Procedure
1.
The SOFIMUN
Rules of Procedure (hereinafter the “SOFIMUN
Rules”) are not subject to change and shall be
considered adopted prior to the beginning of the
conference.
2.
In a case of
conflict between a general rule of the SOFIMUN
Rules (Chapters I-VI) and the special rules of a
committee, the latter shall prevail.
RULE 2 -
Languages
English shall be the official working language of
the conference.
RULE 3 -
Representative
For the purpose of the SOFIMUN Rules, Delegates
and Observers will be referred to as
Representatives.
RULE 4 -
Credentials
The SOFIMUN Secretariat has accepted the
credentials of Delegates or Observers prior to the
opening of the conference. Actions relating to the
alteration of rights or credentials of any Staff
Member, Delegate or Chairperson may exclusively be
initiated by the Secretary-General.
RULE 5 –
Delegates
1.
Each Member
State to a committee shall be represented by one
Delegate.
2.
The Delegates
shall have speaking and voting rights on all
matters in the committee they belong to.
RULE 6 -
Observers
The Representative of an accredited SOFIMUN
observer (Non-governmental Organization or
International Organization) shall have the same
rights as a Delegate except that he/she may not
vote on substantive matters and may not sign nor
sponsor Draft Agendas, Resolutions and Amendments.
RULE 7 -
Chairperson
1.
The
Chairperson shall preside over the committee. The
Chairperson shall declare the opening and closure
of each committee session, compose the Speakers’
list, propose the limitation of the speaking time,
accord the right to speak and announce decisions.
2.
The
Chairperson acts in an equitable and objective
manner, observes the SOFIMUN Rules and shall have
complete control of the proceedings in the
committee and of the maintenance of order at the
meetings. The Chairperson shall have the right to
rule out points and motions put forward by
Representatives, unless otherwise provided in the
SOFIMUN Rules. The Chairperson may advise the
Representatives on substantive and procedural
matters in order to enable the good functioning of
the committee.
3.
The
Chairperson has the right to suspend the committee
meeting for a limited time, which he/she must
indicate beforehand. This right is not subject to
appeal.
4.
The
Chairperson’s interpretation of the SOFIMUN Rules
shall prevail. Rule 8 Paragraph 3 is reserved.
RULE 8 -
Secretariat
1.
The
Secretary-General shall have the rights described
hereinafter in all meetings of the committees. The
Secretary-General may nominate a deputy to act in
his place.
2.
The
Secretary-General may at any time make oral and
written statements to a committee concerning any
question under consideration.
3.
The
Secretary-General’s interpretation of the SOFIMUN
Rules shall prevail. The Secretary- General shall,
in his interpretations, take into consideration
equality of treatment and the good functioning of
the conference. The Secretary-General is entitled
to adopt measures not stated herein, if he
considers it necessary.
4.
The
Secretariat shall:
a.
Assist the
Chairperson and the Secretary-General;
b.
Receive,
correct and circulate documents;
c.
Have custody
of the documents in the archives; and
d.
Generally
perform all other work that may be required for
the good functioning of the conference.
II. AGENDA
RULE 9 -
Provisional Agenda
A Provisional Agenda for the committee sessions
will be set by the Chairperson and communicated to
the Representatives prior to the opening of the
SOFIMUN.
RULE 10 -
Adoption of the
Agenda
1.
A speakers’
List is kept in order to discuss the Provisional
Agenda.
2.
A Delegate may
introduce a Draft Agenda, which may alter the
order of items as well as delete items on the
Provisional Agenda. No additional items may be
added to the Provisional Agenda. Three (3)
sponsors are required for the Draft Agenda to be
considered.
3.
When the
speakers’ list is exhausted or a Motion for
Closure of the Debate passes, the Chairperson
determines the order in which the Draft Agendas
are voted upon. Draft Agendas, which alter the
Provisional Agenda most fundamentally, are
considered first. The original Provisional Agenda
is put to vote last. The Agenda shall be adopted
in the form of the first Draft Agenda, which
gathers a majority of two thirds of the Delegates
present and voting. Discussions concerning the
Agenda shall then cease and the committee
immediately moves to the first item on the Agenda.
4.
If no Agenda
is adopted during voting procedure, debate on the
Agenda shall resume and a new speakers’ list shall
be established.
5.
If a committee
fails to adopt the Agenda within a timeframe the
Secretary-General considers reasonable, he shall
set the Agenda.
6.
The Agenda
adopted at the beginning of the conference shall
remain for the duration of the SOFIMUN. The
inclusion of an urgent Agenda item at the
discretion of the Chairperson is reserved.
III. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
RULE 11 -
Quorum
1.
A committee
meeting can be opened provided at least a majority
of the Representatives are present.
2.
In order to
establish presence, the Chairperson, prior to the
opening of the meeting, shall proceed with a roll
call in the course of which he/she shall call upon
Representatives in English alphabetical order.
Delegates stating ‘present and voting’ must not
abstain from voting on substantive matters.
RULE 12 -
Speakers’ List
1.
If not decided
upon differently, formal debate rules apply. The
Chairperson shall keep a Speakers’ List, which
determines the order of speeches.
2.
A
Representative may request to have the name of
his/her delegation added to the Speakers’ List by
raising his/her placard.
3.
If
circumstances do not allow to clearly determine
which Representative has raised his/her placard
first, the Chairperson shall decide on the order
of the Speakers’ List by taking into account
considerations of equity and the good functioning
of the committee.
4.
A
Representative, whose delegation’s name is already
set forth on the Speakers’ List, shall not be
added again until he/she completes his/her speech.
RULE 13 -
Speeches
1.
No
Representative may address a committee without
having previously obtained the permission of the
Chairperson.
2.
The
Chairperson limits the time allotted to each
speaker. A Representative may at any time when the
floor is open, but not during speeches, introduce
a Motion to Change the Speaking Time. This motion
is non-debatable and passes at the discretion of
the Chairperson. The decision of the Chairperson
is not subject to appeal.
3.
If a
Representative addresses the committee without
permission, exceeds the allowed time for his
speech, makes irrelevant or offensive statements,
or violates the SOFIMUN Rules in any other way,
the Chairperson may call him/her to order.
RULE 14 -
Yields
1.
A
Representative who was granted the right to speak
by the Chairperson during formal debate may yield
his/her remaining speaking time to another
Representative.
2.
A
Representative may also yield his/her remaining
time to answering questions. In this case, the
Chairperson designates Representatives whose
questions may consequently be answered by the
yielding Representative. Statements and comments,
which go beyond a mere question, are not in order.
3.
A
Representative may, if he wishes, yield the floor
back to the Chairpersons.
4.
The floor may
be yielded only one (1) time during a speech.
RULE 15 -
Point of Personal
Privilege
A Representative may at any time, introduce a
Point of Personal Privilege in order to remove a
personal discomfort, which impairs his/her ability
to participate in the proceedings. The
Representative shall rise when called by the
Chairperson and explain his/her grievance. The
Chairperson may rule out a Point of Personal
Privilege. The decision of the Chairperson is not
subject to appeal.
RULE 16 -
Point of Order
1.
A
Representative may at any time, except during the
execution of another Point of Order introduce a
Point of Order to complain about improper
parliamentary procedure. The Representative shall
rise when called by the Chairperson and explain
his/her grievance. The Chairperson may rule out a
Point of Order. The decision of the Chairperson is
not subject to appeal.
2.
Representative
may not, in raising the Point of Order, speak on
the substance of the matter under discussion.
RULE 17 –
Parliamentary Inquiry
A Representative may at any time when the floor is
open, but not during speeches, introduce a
Parliamentary Inquiry in order to clarify a
technical point regarding the SOFIMUN Rules. The
Representative shall rise when called by the
Chairperson and make his/her point. The
Chairperson shall respond to the Representative’s
concern and attempt to clarify the matter.
RULE 18 -
Right of Reply
1.
A
Representative whose personal or national
integrity has been infringed by another
Representative may, at the end of the latter’s
speech, request the Right of Reply. The
Chairperson shall decide upon the request
immediately. The decision of the Chairperson is
not subject to appeal. If the Right of Reply is
granted, the wronged Representative may
immediately speak during one (1) minute.
2.
Right of Reply
to a Right of Reply is not in order.
RULE 19 -
Motion for Moderated
Caucus
1.
Moderated
Caucus interrupts a formal debate for a time
specified by the Chairperson. No Speakers’ List
shall be kept. A Representative may signal his/her
desire to speak by raising his/her placard. The
Chairperson designates the speakers taking into
consideration equity and the good functioning of
the committee. The decision of the Chairperson is
not subject to appeal. The Chairperson shall limit
the speaking time.
2.
A
Representative may at any time when the floor is
open, but not during speeches, introduce a Motion
for Moderated Caucus. The Representative shall
rise when called by the Chairperson to explain the
purpose of the motion and propose a time for the
Caucus and the individual speaking time. The
Motion for Moderated Caucus requires the support
of a second Representative, is non-debatable and
shall immediately be put to vote. A majority of
Representatives present and voting is required for
the Motion for Moderated Caucus to pass. The
Chairperson may rule the Motion for Moderated
Caucus out of order. The decision of the
Chairperson is not subject to appeal.
RULE 20 -
Motion for
Un-moderated Caucus
1.
Un-moderated
caucus interrupts a formal debate for a given time
specified by the Chairperson. It is used for
informal debates and negotiations.
2.
Representative
may at any time when the floor is open, but not
during speeches, introduce a Motion for Caucus.
The Representative shall rise when called by the
Chairperson to explain the purpose of the motion
and propose a time for the Caucus. The Motion for
Caucus requires the support of a second
Representative, is non-debatable and shall
immediately be put to vote. A majority of
Representatives present and voting is required for
the Motion for Caucus to pass. The Chairperson may
rule the Motion for Caucus out of order. The
decision of the Chairperson is not subject to
appeal.
RULE 21 -
Motion for
Adjournment
1.
The
adjournment of the meeting suspends the meeting
for the day.
2.
A
Representative may at any time when the floor is
open, but not during speeches, introduce a Motion
for Adjournment. The Motion requires the support
of a second Representative. The Chairperson may
rule out the Motion for Adjournment. The decision
of the Chairperson is subject to appeal and can be
ruled out by two thirds of Representatives present
and voting.
3.
The Motion for
Adjournment is debatable. Rules governing
Moderated Caucus apply. The debate on the Motion
for Adjournment shall not exceed five (5) minutes.
4.
A majority of
Representatives present and voting are required
for the Motion for Adjournment to pass.
RULE 22 -
Motion for Closure of
the Debate
1.
The closure of
the debate immediately terminates all discussions
on the item of the Agenda under debate and brings
all Amendments and Resolutions on the floor to
vote.
2.
A
Representative may at any time when the floor is
open, but not during speeches, introduce a Motion
for Closure of the debate. The Motion requires the
support of a second Representative. The
Chairperson may rule out the Motion for Closure of
the Debate. The decision of the Chairperson is
subject to appeal and can be ruled out by two
thirds of Representatives present and voting.
3.
The Motion for
Closure of the Debate is debatable, rules
governing Moderated Caucus apply. The debate on
the Motion for Closure of the Debate shall not
exceed five (5) minutes.
4.
Two thirds of
Representatives present and voting are required
for the Motion for Closure of the Debate to pass.
RULE 23 -
Precedence of Points
and Motions
Points and Motions will be considered in the
following order of preference:
1. Points in order at any time including during
speeches and voting procedure:
a.
Point of
Personal Privilege (Rule 15)
b.
Point of Order
(Rule 16)
2. Point in order when the floor is open:
a. Point of Parliamentary Inquiry (Rule 17)
3. Non debatable motions in order when the floor
is open:
a. Motion for Un-moderated Caucus (Rule 19)
b. Motion for Moderated Caucus (Rule 20)
c. Motion to Change the Speaking Time (Rule 13)
4. Debatable Motions in order when the floor is
open:
a. Motion for Adjournment of the Meeting (Rule 21)
b. Motion for Closure of Debate (Rule 22)
IV. RESOLUTIONS
RULE 24 –
Working Papers
A Representative may have a Working Paper
distributed to the committee, the format of which
is free. If a Working Paper has been approved by
the Chairperson, the Secretariat assigns it a
number and distributes the Working Paper to all
the Representatives. Working Papers require no
sponsors or signatories.
RULE 25 -
Draft Resolutions
1.
The
Chairperson approves a document if it has the
required format and the required number of
Sponsors and Signatories. An approved document is
referred to as a Draft Resolution and may be
introduced to the committee.
2.
Sponsors are
recognized as the writers of the Draft Resolution.
A minimum of three (3) Sponsors are required for
the Draft Resolution to be discussed in the
committee.
3.
Signatories
supporter discussion of the Draft Resolution and
do not have further obligations. One quarter of
the Delegates present must be either Sponsors or
Signatories of the Draft Resolution for it to be
introduced to the committee. A Delegate may not at
the same time be Sponsor as well as Signatory of a
given Draft Resolution.
4.
Delegates may
add to, or remove their name from the list of
signatories at any time during the debate. This
request should be submitted in written form to the
Chairperson for approval.
5.
More than one
Draft Resolution may be on the floor at any time.
RULE 26 -
Introducing
Resolutions
If a Draft Resolution has been approved by the
Chairperson, the Secretariat assigns it a number
and distributes the Draft Resolution to all the
Representatives. A Sponsor of the Draft Resolution
may motion to introduce the Resolution when the
floor is open. The introduction of the Draft
Resolution will be limited to reading out the
operative clauses. Subsequently, the Sponsor will
answer questions of clarification regarding the
Draft Resolution. Substantive statements regarding
the Draft Resolution are not in order at this
stage. The question session shall not exceed five
(5) minutes.
RULE 27 -
Withdrawal of
Resolutions
A Draft Resolution may be withdrawn by its
Sponsors at any time before voting on it has
commenced. This request should be submitted in
written form to the Chairperson. A Draft
Resolution may not be withdrawn if an Unfriendly
Amendment to it is on the floor.
V. AMENDMENTS
RULE 28 -
Amendments
1.
Amendments to
the preambulatory clauses are not in order.
2.
Grammatical,
spelling and formatting errors in Draft
Resolutions will be corrected without a vote. The
final decisions on corrections are at the
discretion of the Chairperson.
3.
Substantive
Amendments may be considered ‘friendly’ if
approved by all the Sponsors of the Draft
Resolution. Friendly Amendments are immediately
incorporated into the Draft Resolution without a
vote.
4.
Substantive
Amendments to a Draft Resolution, which are not
approved by all the Sponsors of the Draft
Resolution, are considered ‘Unfriendly’.
Unfriendly Amendments require three (3) Sponsors
and need to be submitted in writing to the
Chairperson for approval. A majority of Delegates
is required to incorporate an Unfriendly Amendment
into the Draft Resolution.
5.
Amendments to
Unfriendly Amendments are out of order.
RULE 29 -
Withdrawal of
Unfriendly Amendments
An Unfriendly Amendment may be withdrawn by its
Sponsors at any time before voting on it has
commenced. This request should be submitted in
written form to the Chairperson.
VI. VOTING
RULE 30 -
Voting Procedure
1.
In the case of
exhaustion of the Speakers' List or when a Motion
for Closure of Debate passes Resolutions,
Unfriendly Amendments and Draft Agendas on the
floor will be put to vote. If no Resolution is on
the floor the committee shall move to the next
Agenda item.
2.
Each
Representative shall have one vote, which may be
“Yes”, “No” or “Abstain”. Rule 6 concerning the
status of Observers is reserved. On procedural
matters Representatives must not abstain from
voting. Representatives recognized prior to the
opening of the meeting as ‘present and voting’
must not abstain from voting on substantive
matters.
3.
During voting
procedure, Representatives must strictly refrain
from communicating with each other. The voting
procedure must not be interrupted except to raise
a Point of Order or a Point of Personal Privilege.
RULE 31 -
Required Majority
1.
A procedural
or substantive matter requiring a simple majority
shall be passed by a majority of Representatives
present and voting. If a vote is equally divided
the matter put to vote shall be regarded as
rejected.
2.
A procedural
or substantive matter requiring a qualified
majority shall be passed by two thirds of
Representatives present and voting. If a vote is
divided in exactly two thirds and one third of the
Representatives present and voting, the matter put
upon vote shall be regarded as accepted.
3.
Decisions
regarding the adoption of Amendments and
Resolutions shall be made by a simple majority of
Delegates present and voting.
4.
For the
purpose of the SOFIMUN Rules, ‘Representatives
present and voting’ are Representatives casting an
affirmative or negative vote. Representatives,
which abstain from voting, are considered as not
voting.
RULE 32 -
Modes of Voting
1.
If not decided
upon differently, Representatives vote by raising
their placards.
2.
For
substantive matters, a Delegate may request a
roll-call vote. This request is automatically
accepted unless ruled out by the Chairperson. The
decision of the Chairperson is not subject to
appeal.
3.
A roll-call
vote takes place according to the English
alphabetical order of the names of the States
represented in the committee, beginning with the
State whose name is drawn by lot by the
Chairperson. The Chairperson shall subsequently
call the name of each State. The Delegates shall
reply “Yes”, “No” or “Abstain”.
4.
In roll-call
vote, a State may pass once, but then must vote in
the affirmative or negative.
5.
Upon
completion of voting, a Delegate may request the
right to explain his/her vote provided the
substantive nature of the matter. The Chairperson
grants the right to explain the vote. The decision
of the Chairperson is not subject to appeal. The
speaking time shall not exceed two (2) minutes.
The delegates that reply “Yes, with rights” and
“No, with rights” during roll call vote will
automatically be granted the right to explain
their vote. The number of delegates that will be
able to exercise their right to explain the vote
remains at the discretion of the Chairpersons.
RULE 33 -
Voting on Amendments
1.
When an
Amendment is proposed to a Draft Resolution, the
Amendments shall be voted on first.
2.
If two or more
Amendments to a Draft Resolution are proposed, the
Chairperson shall determine the order, in which
they are voted upon. The committee shall first
vote on the Amendment furthest removed in
substance from the Draft Resolution and then on
the Amendment next furthest removed until all
Amendments have been put to the vote. Where,
however, the adoption of one Amendment necessarily
implies the rejection of another Amendment, the
latter shall not be put to the vote. The committee
will consider a Draft Resolution including all
Amendments adopted by the committee.
RULE 34 -
Order of Voting
If two or more Draft Resolutions relate to the
same question, they shall be voted on in the order
in which they were submitted.
VII. SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO THE SECURITY
COUNCIL
RULE 35
1.
Each member of
the Security Council shall have one vote.
2.
Decisions of
the Security Council on procedural matters shall
be made by an affirmative vote of a simple
majority of the members. Decisions of the Security
Council on substantive matters shall be made by an
affirmative vote of nine members including the
concurring votes of the permanent members.
RULE 36
1.
During a
Closed Door Session only delegations of the Member
states represented in the Security Council, the
Chairperson, the Secretariat, and persons
particularly authorized by the Secretary-General
are allowed to attend the session of the Security
Council. The time for a Closed Door Session is
specified by the Chairperson and rules for
Moderated Caucus shall be applied.
2.
A
Representative may at any time when the floor is
open, but not during speeches, introduce a Motion
for Closed Door Session. The Representative shall
rise when called by the Chairperson to explain the
purpose of the motion and propose a time for the
Closed Door Session. The Motion requires the
support of a second Representative is
non-debatable and shall immediately be put to
vote. The Chairperson may rule out the Motion for
Closed Door Session. The decision of the
Chairperson is subject to appeal.
3.
The time of
the Closed Door Session may be extended once.
RULE 37
The Chairperson may propose to invite any Member
of the United Nations not a Member of the Security
Council and any State not a Member of the United
Nations to attend a meeting of the Security
Council. The proposal of the Chairperson shall be
put to vote. A majority of Delegates present and
voting is required for the proposal to pass.
RULE 38
The Security Council may appoint a Commission or
Committee or a Rapporteur for a specified
question.
RULE 39
1.
The Security
Council may choose to issue a Presidential
Statement on issues which do not warrant a
resolution. This statement is formally from the
Chairperson of the Security Council, but is
drafted by the body.
2.
This statement
must be accepted by a consensus of the Security
Council.
3.
These may
either be produced as a “Presidential Statement”
or as a more strongly worded “Presidential
Statement of Consensus”.
IIX. SPECIAL RULES
APPLICABLE TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
RULE 40
1.
The Human
Rights Council (hereinafter ‘the Council’) may
appoint a Special Rapporteur, an independent
expert or a working group to examine, monitor,
advice, and publicly report on a situation
specific country or territories, entitled as
country mandates, or on a thematic issue of human
rights violation, entitled as thematic mandate.
2.
The scope and
length of a mandate is set out by a Resolution of
the Council.
3.
Mandates may
include conducting studies, providing advice on
technical cooperation, responding to individual
complaints, and engaging in general promotional
activities. All mandate holders are required to
report on their activities to the Council on an
annual basis.
IX. SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO THE CONFERENCE ON
DISARMAMENT
RULE 41 -
Functions and
Membership
1.
The Conference
on Disarmament (hereinafter referred to as the
Conference) is a disarmament negotiating forum
open to the nuclear weapon States and 15 other
States.
2.
All member
States of the Conference shall take part in its
work in conditions of full equality as independent
States, in accordance with the principle of
sovereign equality enshrined in the Charter of the
United Nations.
RULE 42 -
Agenda
1.
At the
beginning of the session, the Conference shall
adopt its agenda, requiring a two thirds majority
of the members present and voting. In doing so,
the Conference shall take into account the
Provisional Agenda made to it by the Chairperson
and Draft Agendas presented by member States of
the Conference.
2.
A Draft Agenda
that includes additional items not contained in
the Provisional Agenda requires six (6) sponsors.
Such items must be consistent with the Conference
on Disarmament’s Decalogue.
RULE 43 -
Working Documents
Proposals submitted to the Conference shall be
referred to as ‘Working Documents’. The process of
proposing, amending and voting Working Documents
shall be governed by the SOFIMUN Rules with the
exception of the designation of the document.
RULE 44 -
Organization of Work
1.
Whenever the
Conference deems it advisable for the effective
performance of its functions, including when it
appears that there is a basis to negotiate a draft
treaty or other draft texts, the Conference may
establish subsidiary bodies, such as ad hoc sub
committees, working groups, technical groups or
groups of governmental experts, open to all member
States of the Conference unless the Conference
decides otherwise. The Conference shall define the
mandate for each of such subsidiary bodies and
provide appropriate support for their work.
2.
The Conference
shall decide if its own rules of procedure may be
adapted to the specific requirements of its
subsidiary bodies. The meetings of the subsidiary
bodies shall be informal unless the Conference
decides otherwise.
RULE 45 -
Program of Work
1.
On the basis
of its agenda, the Conference may establish a
Program of Work, which will include a schedule of
its activities for that session or for the
duration up to the beginning of the next
2.
The Program of
Work shall address specific problems and outline
the procedures leading to a solution of such
problems. The Program of Work shall build on
converging points which lead to international
instruments acceptable for all members and may
include the establishment of subsidiary bodies or
the appointment of a Special Coordinator to
address the defined problem.
RULE 46 -
Consensus
The Conference shall adopt its decisions on all
substantive matters, with the exception of the
Agenda, by consensus. Such decisions require the
presence and voting of at least two thirds of the
Delegates.
VI. Diagram: The birth of a resolution
*NB: The diagram states 5 signatories are needed,
this is true for committees of 29-32 members (see
rule 25.3)
|